Politics

Biden, G-7 leaders announce major security pledge to Ukraine

Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

VILNIUS, Lithuania — President Biden and other world leaders announced a major security program to boost Ukraine’s defenses over the long term, capping a NATO summit in which Ukraine was not invited to join the alliance but came away with a promise of years’ worth of additional military and humanitarian funding.

White House officials described the pact as a highlight of the gathering in Lithuania, saying it showcased a unified determination by the allies to protect Ukraine from another invasion like the one mounted by Russia last year.

The goal is “to make it clear that our support will last long into the future,” Biden said, flanked by counterparts including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. “We’re going to help Ukraine build a strong, capable defense across land, air and sea, which will be a force of stability in the region and deter against any and all threats.”

The venue was a summit of NATO’s 31 members, but the promise of an ongoing flow of aid came from a smaller group of the world’s most powerful democracies: the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Canada, Italy and Japan. Biden also used the setting to tout his diplomatic record and advance his broader worldview, reiterating themes of global harmony and cooperation that are a pillar of his reelection pitch.

“We need to take the same spirit of unity, common purpose, determination that we’ve demonstrated in our response to Russian aggression in Ukraine and bring more partners along, as we continue working to build a world we want to live in and a world we want for our children,” Biden said during an evening speech to a crowd of almost 10,000 at Vilnius University.

The president and the other Group of Seven leaders declared they would seek to deter Russia from future aggression by joining to bolster Ukraine’s defenses and strengthening its alliances. Each G-7 country now will ink its own bilateral security arrangement with Ukraine, an effort that could invite political complexities as the war slogs through its second year.

Zelensky, who had blasted NATO a day earlier for not offering a timeline for accepting Ukraine as a member, took a more conciliatory tone Wednesday in thanking the group. The “Ukrainian delegation is bringing home [a] significant security victory for the Ukraine, for our country, for our people, for our children,” he said.

The announcement came a day after NATO leaders declined to provide a timeline for when Ukraine would be able to join the alliance, a move that led Zelensky to lash out at the group in a blunt tweet. While a security pact does not provide the same kind of joint defense protections that NATO membership would have offered, it could significantly bolster Ukraine’s ability to defend itself.

“It’s a powerful statement — a powerful statement — of our commitment to Ukraine as it defends its freedom today and as it rebuilds the future,” Biden said. “And we’re going to be there as long as that takes.”

The heads of state did not provide a timeline for how long it could take for the bilateral security commitments to be reached, but several G-7 countries announced new forms of military and humanitarian support for Ukraine during the summit.

In his Vilnius University address at the end of the summit, Biden sharply condemned Russian President Vladimir Putin and said he had made a “bad bet” in pursuing the war.

“Even after all this time, Putin still doubts our staying power,” Biden said. “He still doesn’t understand that our commitment, our values, our freedom is something we can never, never, ever, ever walk away from. It’s who we are.”

Biden, who met with Zelensky after the announcement, has previously said he could envision a security arrangement with Ukraine similar to the guarantees the United States provides to Israel. With strong support in Congress, Washington provides more than $3.8 billion annually in military aid to the Jewish state.

It’s not clear if Biden can muster the same level of bipartisanship for funding the ongoing war in Ukraine. Some Republicans in Congress have balked at the billions of dollars U.S. taxpayers have already sent to bolster Ukraine against Russia, and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) has said Kyiv should not receive a “blank check.”

Several Republican presidential candidates, who hope to oust Biden from office, have also questioned the wisdom of sending money and arms to Kyiv.

Zelensky, who tweeted Tuesday that “uncertainty is weakness,” had hoped to leave the NATO summit with a clearer road map for his country’s bid to join the alliance. He said NATO’s failure to offer that would only motivate Russia to “continue its terror.”

But Biden’s advisers contended that despite Zelensky’s public complaint earlier in the week, the summit had been a success.

“Putin is sitting in the Kremlin thinking, ‘Ah, this is good for me,’” national security adviser Jake Sullivan told a conference on the sidelines of the summit on Wednesday. “He’s going to be proven wrong once again, because the alliance is going to come out of this summit united, purposeful, committed, energized.”

The summit will be remembered for paving the way for Sweden to join the alliance, which had been in doubt for months. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, in the lead-up to the summit, agreed to extend his tenure for a year, avoiding a clash over his successor. And the allies reiterated their commitment to welcome Ukraine as a member in the future.

Zelensky on Wednesday notably softened his message to allies in a news conference alongside Stoltenberg.

“I can confirm that the results of the summit were good,” he said, adding the caveat that Ukraine still wishes to be invited to join NATO. “But if there had been an invitation, they would have been ideal.”

“We understand that some people are afraid to speak of our membership now, because no one wants a world war. This is also understandable and logical,” he said. Asked later if he was satisfied with the results of the summit, Zelensky said, “We have great unity for our leaders and security guarantees — that is a success for the summit.”

A day earlier, the Ukrainian president jolted the gathering by blasting NATO leaders’ joint statement on his country’s prospective membership, calling its lack of a concrete timeline “unprecedented and absurd.”

His outburst angered some allies who felt they had worked hard to find a compromise on the still divisive question of Ukrainian membership. The summit’s final communiqué on Tuesday included the declaration that “Ukraine’s future is in NATO” and that an official invitation would be forthcoming “when Allies agree and conditions are met.”

Even as he changed his tone Wednesday, Zelensky continued to express some dissatisfaction with the lack of clarity over what precise conditions Ukraine would need to meet to become a full-fledged NATO member, taking to Twitter to declare that the “absolute majority of our people expect specifics about these conditions.”

While NATO membership may not be imminent for Ukraine, the long-term bilateral commitments from G-7 members could be significant in convincing Putin that he cannot prevail in a prolonged war, said Max Bergmann, a former State Department official who leads the Europe, Russia and Eurasia program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

“It’s really important that the Europeans also make that commitment, that if there is an election that goes a certain way in Washington in 2024 that European commitments will be there,” he said before the summit.

The G-7 agreement follows months of discussions among its leaders and Kyiv, and includes efforts to strengthen Ukraine’s economy and carry out good governance reforms, according to a White House official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to preview the deal before it was announced. Such reforms, along with an end to the Russian invasion, are probably preconditions for Ukraine to join NATO.

Biden administration officials expect other countries will want to join after the announcement, the official said, adding that negotiations between Washington and Kyiv on the contours of the bilateral security package will begin soon.

Some NATO leaders suggested Zelensky would do well to show more appreciation for allies who are spending enormous sums and considerable political capital to help him stave off the Russian onslaught. “Whether we like it or not, people want to see gratitude,” British Defense Secretary Ben Wallace told reporters at the summit, according to several British media outlets.

But others voiced sympathy for Zelensky’s urgent appeals and said, in the end, the alliance came together.

“Any of us in Zelensky’s shoes would feel and probably act the same way,” Latvian Prime Minister Krisjanis Karins said in an interview on Wednesday. “But at the end of the day, when we were all speaking before and during dinner, we were not on different pages. We were all together and the feeling inside the room was very, very positive, very collegial.”

Others echoed the optimistic tone. Britain hailed the new security program as a “major step toward ending the war” and suggested it would deter future acts of aggression against Ukraine.

“We can never see a repeat of what has happened in Ukraine, and this declaration reaffirms our commitment to ensure it is never left vulnerable to the kind of brutality Russia has inflicted on it again,” Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said in a statement.

Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida added that “the G-7 will continue to stand by Ukraine. Our solidarity will never waver.”

Biden sent a similar message in his speech at Vilnius University. The White House billed the address as a centerpiece of the president’s five-day, three-country trip to Europe, which will conclude Thursday in Helsinki.

Throughout his trip, Biden has effusively touted the value of global partnerships and alliances, drawing an unspoken but unmistakable contrast with his Republican rivals — specifically former president Donald Trump — who have questioned U.S. support for groups like NATO.

“At the most fundamental level, we face a choice,” Biden said, “a choice between a world defined by coercion and exploitation where might makes right, or a world where we recognize that our own success is bound to the success of others.”

David L. Stern in Kyiv, Ukraine, contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on The Washington Post